THIS IS AN OLDER BLOG POST ABOUT THE 1989 PLAN TO REBUILD DFW AIRPORT. PART 1 OF AN BRAND-NEW EXPANDED ARTICLE ON THE PLAN, CAN BE FOUND HERE. In 1989, a spectacular plan was presented that saw the elimination of Dallas/Fort Worth Airport's characteristic semi-circular terminals, replacing them with gigantic linear terminals. Read all about it below! CHANGING REQUIREMENTS With its semi-circular terminal buildings, Dallas/Fort Worth Airport has one of the most recognizable airport layouts in the world. Opened in January, 1974, the airport's "drive-to-the-gate" concept was devised in a time when it was thought that "DFW" would mainly serve people originating in, and destined for the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex. Each of the four terminals would serve one major airline or a group of smaller airlines. In the master plan it was envisaged that 13 circular terminals would be built. However, in the years following deregulation in 1978, airlines shifted to the hub-and-spoke model and airports were increasingly dominated by one or two carriers. By 1987, DFW's two principal airlines, American and Delta, carried over 80% of the airport's traffic and they transferred two-thirds of their passengers. For one, this meant that increasingly passengers had to switch between terminals in order to catch their connecting flight. Although the terminals were connected by an automated people mover, it was quite slow and only traveled in one direction! Hubbing also lead to aircraft congestion during peaks, as both airlines operated on the eastern side of the airport. LINEAR CONCOURSES In 1987, planners suggested to build three small "Atlanta-style" concourses west of, and perpendicular to International Parkway, the north-south highway dissecting the airport. By 1989, this had evolved into a scheme to build a single very long concourse, parallel to International Parkway. This new facility would be used exclusively by American Airlines. By 2010, all half-loop terminals would be eliminated, to be replaced with linear terminals both east and west of the International Parkway. The scheme would double the number of gates from over a 100 to 200. Traffic forecasts showed that traffic would rise from 47.5 million passengers in 1989, to over a 100 million passengers and a whopping 1.2 million aircraft movements by 2010, a number that could be comfortably handled by the new layout. At the time, the total project cost was calculated at USD 3.5 billion (USD 7.2 billion in 2019 dollars), only USD 300 million less than the projected cost for the gigantic new Denver Airport, which was being developed at the time in tandem. Due to the huge cost, the scheme was abandoned. Instead, the existing facilities were improved and expanded. As we know now, the traffic never grew to the extent that was forecast back in the late 1980s. Although DFW by all means is a mega-hub, the airport handled only 69.1 million passengers in 2018. Hope you enjoyed!
PART 1 OF A FULL FEATURE ON THE WESTSIDE TERMINAL IS NOW ONLINE. YOU CAN READ IT HERE. PART 2 IS NOW ONLINE! YOU CAN FIND IT HERE. Do you have other interesting information about this plan? Please share it below ↓
4 Comments
Geoffrey Baskir
1/11/2019 10:52:37
I was involved in some of the conceptual planning back then, which is why I recognize the Airport Layout Plan drawing. This project began as early as 1986 and was a response to American Airlines' desire for better flow and gates for larger aircraft. Later, the concept found its way into the Master Plan Update which occurred in 1989. Among those who worked on the effort were George Vittas (American Airlines; later AECOM), Jeff Fegan, when he was still Manager of Planning, Bill Small (Bechtel) and more people than I can remember. Some early simulation modeling was done on the concept using the Airport Machine visual simulation model created by Dr. Everett Joline. It was determined that such a redesign would be too costly.
Reply
Christopher Gay
1/11/2019 18:02:58
A very good article about the history of DFW's CTA. One think to take into consideration about the 1980's forecast is 9/11. Nobody could imagine something like that happening and the catastrophic effects it had on the industry that resulted in airline downsizing and consolidation. Without that day, I'm sure that DFW would have surpassed those numbers. Today, DFW is about to finally surpass those numbers and they are planning a new terminal (Terminal F). I would expect that very similar conversations are occuring between the airport and airlines.
Reply
David Kaufman
3/11/2019 09:53:53
Very interesting, and thank you. It's great to dig up airport "Missed Her" plans that never broke ground. Some other interesting ones were the late 1970s plan for (huge) New York-Stewart, the aborted "JFK 2000", and the proposal at SFO to build new runways on landfill out in the Bay. Then there have been the several ambitious concepts for London UK's three major air carrier airports. // On the final graphic of DFW above, it shows an 8-runway layout. 7/8 of that was indeed achieved, but the far west north-south was cancelled because of development (thus opposition in that area). DFW, with its 7 runways, is presently tied with Chicago-ORD for the record for world airport with the most air carrier runways. When ORD's new Runway 9C/27C opens next year, it alone will hold the record with 8.
Reply
Christopher Gay
3/11/2019 14:43:48
Currently, it is my understanding that DFW has enough airfield capacity for the next 50 years with the final construction of the perimeter taxiways that go around the ends of the 4 primary north/south runways. This system enables a safer and more efficient use of current runway infrastructure. That also takes into account projected growth of the AA Super Hub, other airlines growth, and the addition of the new Terminal F.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
With a title inspired by the setting of the iconic 70s film "Airport", this blog is the ultimate destination for airport history fans.
Categories
All
About me
Marnix (Max) Groot Founder of AirportHistory.org. Max is an airport development expert and historian. |