A Visual History of the World's Great Airports
  • Airports
  • Blog
  • About
  • Digital Library

Blue Concourse

The Airport History Blog

The Lambert-St. Louis 2000 Plan

12/2/2022

3 Comments

 
During our recent digs in the AirportHistory.org archives we unearthed a fascinating 1972 proposal to massively expand St. Louis Lambert International Airport.

The plan, called the Lambert-St. Louis 2000 Plan envisaged the construction of a third parallel runway and a huge new terminal complex north of the current airport. Let's take a closer look and see what this plan was all about!
The St. Louis Lambert Airport 1972 Master Plan
BACKGROUND

The Jet-Age travel boom led to an ongoing capacity crisis at St. Louis Lambert International Airport, then called Lambert-St. Louis International Airport.

Between 1958 and 1969, the airport's passenger traffic increased almost fourfold. By 1970, Lambert handled 6.6 million passengers, ranking it the 13th busiest in the nation and 20th in the world.
an aerial overview of St. Louis Lambert Airport in 1970.
An overview of St. Louis Lambert Airport in 1970. The passenger terminal is visible in the lower right. The area on the far side of the main runway was mainly occupied by the facilities of aircraft manufacturer McDonnell Douglas.
Despite a planned terminal expansion, in 1968, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) concluded that Lambert would be unable to accomodate the air traffic demands expected by 1982 and that a replacement airport should be made operational by 1980.
St. Louis Lambert Airport 1972 traffic forecast
Traffic studies in the early 1970s projected that by the year 2000 over 60 million air passengers would depart and arrive in St. Louis.
Want more stunning airport photos & stories?
Sign up to our newsletter below to know when new content goes online.
THE COLUMBIA-WATERLOO PLAN

In May 1972, the newly created St. Louis Metropolitan Area Airport Authority, adopted a plan prepared by R. Dixon Speas Associates for a proposed USD 350 million airport to be located near Columbia and Waterloo, 19 miles (30 kilometers) southeast of St. Louis, in the neighboring state of Illinois.

In January 1972, the authority applied for USD 8.4 million to begin land acquisition.
Second St. Louis Airport at Columbia-Waterloo
The location of the Columbia-Waterloo Airport 19 miles southeast of St. Louis. Plans called for a six-runway airport in a layout similar to that of DFW, which was being constructed at the time.
THE LAMBERT-ST. LOUIS 2000 PLAN

There was fierce opposition to the plans, among others by the Missouri legislature.
It created the Missouri-St. Louis Metropolitan Airport Authority to oppose the Illinois airport plan.

In October 1972, the authority unveiled an expansion plan titled the Lambert-St. Louis 2000 Plan, designed to enable Lambert to adequately serve the city's needs until the year 2000. 

​The plan, developed by Wilbur Smith & Associates, called for adding 800 acres to the airport, building a new parallel northwest-southeast runway north of the McDonnell Douglas facilities at Lambert and constructing a new ninety-gate terminal building on the northeast side of the airport.
The Lambert-St. Louis 2000 plan
The Lambert-St-Louis 2000 Plan superimposed over existing development. The plans would not affect residential areas but they would require demolishing some facilities belonging to McDonnell Douglas Corporation.
Picture
The proposed new terminal would include an underground subway station as well as an intra-terminal transit system transporting passengers within the terminal.
​The Lambert-St. Louis 2000 Plan carried a USD 370-million price tag, including USD 75 million for land acquisition, USD 75 million for the new terminal, and USD 30 million for the new runway and taxiways.

The runway would provide the FAA-required spacing to permit simultaneous instrument landings, which Lambert's configuration did not allow. Improvements under the plan would allow Lambert to handle 60 million passengers annually.

SUPPORT

The plan contains many letters of support, including from: US, state, and local officials; Ozark Airlines, which had its headquarters in St. Louis; Ford, which had a major assembly plant north of the airport; and the Norfolk and Western Railway Company, which was active in developing industry in the vicinity of the airport.

Interestingly, the plan didn't contain endorsements from Trans World Airlines (TWA), which had a major base at St. Louis-Lambert, and from the McDonnell Douglas Corporation, a major aerospace manufacturing firm and defense contractor, which was headquartered at the airport and had sprawling facilities there.
Add the Lambert-St. Louis 2000 Master Plan to your airport collection!
Click the images below to purchase a high-quality digitized copy of this visionairy 62-page plan, a must-have for airport history fans!

​See all St-Louis Lambert items for purchase.
During a referendum and subsequent mayoral election in March 1973, support for the Victoria-Waterloo proposal was swept away. The focus shifted back to improving Lambert. Things were looking good for the Lambert-St. Louis 2000 plan.

However, a significant obstacle arose when James S. McDonnell, chairman of  McDonnell Douglas, criticized the plans on the grounds that it would wipe out some of the company's facilities and inhibit its future expansion at the site.

​As a result, new master plan studies were prepared. Due to the oil crisis of 1973 and the resulting decline in traffic, the plans focused on increasing capacity of the existing terminal.

​There was no provision for an additional runway, as improvements to the existing runway system were deemed sufficient to handle traffic growth into the mid-1990s.
Aerial view of the McDonnel Douglas facilities at St. Louis Lambert International Airport
A 1980s aerial view of some of McDonnell Douglas' facilities north of the airport. Execution of the Lambert-St. Louis 2000 Plan would have affected some properties of the company and heavily curtail possibilities to expand at Lambert.
DECLINE

In 2000, Lambert handled a record 30.5 million passengers, ranking it the eighth busiest airport in the United States. That same year the decision was taken to build a new runway 11-29 west of the airport. 

It was half the number of passengers once projected by the Lambert-St. Louis 2000 Plan back in 1972 and it was to be the highest number of passengers that Lambert would ever process.

Following the absorption of TWA into American Airlines in 2001 and the subsequent termination of TWA's St. Louis hub, traffic dwindled from 26 million passengers in 2001 to 13 million in 2004. In 2019, the last year before COVID, Lambert handled almost 16 million passengers.
Aerial view of St. Louis Lambert International Airport in 2014
A 2014 aerial overview of St. Louis Lambert Airport looking southeast. Runway 11-29, which opened in 2006, is visible in the lower right of the image.
The Lambert-St. Louis 2000 Plan stands as a testament to a time when the sky was literally the limit and St. Louis-Lambert was poised to become one of busiest hubs in the US and one of the world's pre-eminent gateways!
What do you think of the Lambert-St. Louis 2000 Plan? Do you think it could have meant a better future for St. Louis-Lambert Airport or would things have turned out more or less the same way?

​Let us know your thoughts in the comments below!
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS & FURTHER RECOMMENDED READING

For this article, I quoted from the book The Aerial Crossroads of America: St. Louis Lambert Airport, written by Daniel Rust. Published by the Missouri History Museum Press in 2016, this 336-page book is a scholarly, exhaustive history on Lambert International Airport up until 2015.

My only major criticism on the book is that there are very few illustrations, which is a missed opportunity. Still, Aerial Crossroads is a fine book and I highly recommend it.

Buy your copy from the University of Chicago Press or from Amazon.

Also, check out the avaiable STL publications in the AirportHistory library.
Click here for more airport articles
Add the Lambert-St. Louis 2000 Master Plan to your airport collection!
Click the images below to purchase a high-quality digitized copy of this visionairy 62-page plan, a must-have for airport history fans!

​See all Lambert-St-Louis items for purchase.
3 Comments
Erin Berghold
21/4/2022 02:11:29

Well per the pictures, our building, currently GKN Aerospace bldg 1, Mac building 27 back then may have been one of the casualties in their progress. McDonnell (Brown) is just to our north, Banshee and Mac's building on the tarmac to our south. Very interesting.

Reply
Gregory Macdougall link
27/4/2022 15:04:59

The plans focused on increasing capacity of the existing terminal. There was no provision for an additional runway, Thank you, amazing post!

Reply
Jen
24/8/2023 21:35:53

The book written in 2016, completely incorporates misinformation. There’s no mention of the small community that existed along Highway 67 west of McDonald Douglas. Many current maps have completely eliminated the existence of the small town of Robertson. That town was blighted and erased in the name of airport expansion, that never occurred. The only true mark of its existence is the church that still sits there amongst the concrete playground of industrialism that poured out after failed expansion plans. Most literature will show that airport. Expansion was not even feasible in that area. However, the bulkhead of cold water creek was there and the runoff that no one seems to ever want to talk about anymore.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    With a title inspired by the setting of the iconic 70s film "Airport", this blog is the ultimate destination for airport history fans.

    Categories

    All
    Aerial Evolution
    Anniversaries
    Books
    Design Explained
    Fascinating Statistics
    Featured Photos
    Fictional Airports
    Never Built
    Other
    Popular Culture
    Story Behind The Image
    Then & Now
    Unique Finds

    RSS Feed

    About me

    Marnix (Max) Groot Founder of AirportHistory.org. Max is an airport development expert and historian.

    Learn more about Max


Copyright disclaimer
Contact us
  • Airports
  • Blog
  • About
  • Digital Library